View Poll Results: What naming convention should be better for libgba for freepascal?

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • Original libgba naming convention

    1 10.00%
  • Pascal naming convention

    9 90.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: LibGBA naming convention

  1. #11

    LibGBA naming convention

    Quote Originally Posted by Legolas
    BTW, do you think that activating absolute for gba could be a feasible task for me? :think:
    It is now activated for GBA.

  2. #12

    LibGBA naming convention

    Quote Originally Posted by dmantione
    Quote Originally Posted by Legolas
    BTW, do you think that activating absolute for gba could be a feasible task for me? :think:
    It is now activated for GBA.
    Nice (and fast)
    BTW I have replaced all custom types with standard ones.
    A doubt I had since a long time: gba libs use a lot of volatile variables. AFAIK volatile tells to compiler that the variable should not be optimized, because its value could change autonomously (eg. by hardware input). Up to now, I have tryed to emulate it by switching optimization off, but I don't know if this is the right way to make the job. :scratch:
    Get your fpc4gba copy now!
    Get your fpc4nds copy now!

  3. #13

    LibGBA naming convention

    You can simply ignore it. Volatile is not necessary for FPC, the compiler doesn't do that kind of optimizations yet.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •