God, for a moment i thougt they were messing up with .NET for fpc..Originally Posted by marcov
I was already putting a rope around my neck..
God, for a moment i thougt they were messing up with .NET for fpc..Originally Posted by marcov
I was already putting a rope around my neck..
If you save your data in a proprietary format, the owner of the format owns your data.
<br /><A href="http://msx80.blogspot.com">http://msx80.blogspot.com</A>
The FPC team will not support .NET verry soon, nobody seems to want .NET support when they can have native(fast) executables for any platform
I guess that .dll does what the QT wrappers do for Kylix, the C++ guys usually forget about other languages and start using objects combined with functions, that's why it's easier to code for GTK/Win, they have a "normal" API that can be used with FPC too.
The biggest problem with QT/wx/whatever is the use of objects wich are not compatible with FPC ones.
The future must be... Fast and OpenSource so...
<br />Think Open and Lightning Fast!
Who do you think wrote the .NET faq entry on the FPC site?Originally Posted by {MSX}
Lightning, read the original message better. wx.net is a plain C wrapper around C++ code. Done for .NET importing, but FPC also needs C++ wrapped
Bookmarks