TileStudio for Lazarus

[Ñuño Martínez]

Sorry for the delay

I'm unsure if it could be of some use anymore, but for the record, I finally dusted my external HDD and this is my tile studio for lazarus

As I already said, it compiles fine and it somewhat works

Thanks. I've downloaded but I couldn't compile it. May be it uses Windows libraries and I'm using Xubuntu :$. BTW my Lazaus is doing estrange things lately, as say it can't find the "form.pp" file while it did open that file by itself. (?)

erm, just read this thread for the first time, and read its 'slow' on wine. Now, although that is TRUE on wine < 1.2.x; I just finished installing and optimizing my new wine 1.3.6 which although being unfriendly to .Net and the like, I can report that an SU4100 with 4gb DDR3 ram seems to cope quite well on Ubuntu 10.10 (using an ATi Radeon HD4330). Although I can still see some slugishness and reluctance on maps larger than 500x500 with large tile sizes. The lazarus version seems to cope a lot better but my window just vanished (I guess thats a crash right?)... What version of wine were you using at the time and what core 2? I've noticed something funny: My 1.3ghz SU4100 cpu with 18 windows open at 40% max CPU runs around 60% faster than a 2.4ghz E6600; which should in theory thrash it in every benchmark. Is it just me or ar Ghz not the complete picture and the flops thing really accurate?

Well, I'm using Xubuntu, and Canonical's Linux isn't "the best of the best". Actually I find it's slower and less profiled than Debian itself (I'm testing Debian in my old IBM PentiumIV 1.8 Ghz without accelerated graphics and its slightly faster than my Dell CoreDuo T6400 2.0Ghz with accelerated Nvidia graphics, except OpenGL obviously).

The Wine I'm using is 1.2, as it is in Canonical's repository.

Sorry its a bit off topic, but if its down to wine 1.3.6 beta's optimization vs the older versions, you may not need to port it after all. And I found one thing so far: most of my apps work BETTER in wine than on windows. Funny isnt it? I have this new policy now: Get as many windows binaries as possible and benchmark them on a Turion RM-70 x2 64 2ghz with win7 ultimate x64 and wine 1.3.6 on ubuntu 10.10x64 with a SU4100 @ 1.3ghz

Isnt life ironic?

This reminds me when I used to use OS/2. It has the ability to run Win16, Win32s and non NT Win32 applications, and applications that break my Windows 3.11 or my Windows 98/SE did work almost perfectly in my OS/2; and if they break then I didn't need to reboot OS/2. Actually I develop my first Windows applications in OS/2. THAT is ironic.

I think it's a constant.