If that's correct then you are going to check if the pointer is nil anyways before using the "is" operator. Else you risk a heavy AV
"is" includes a nil test and returns false in that case.
I don't think so. My application crashes when I try the is operator on an uninitialized pointer
But if the pointer is uninitialized "is" will try to examine an instance that is void :? That's why it is crashing. When you use "is" with a pointer to nil, you get False.
My point exactly
Peregrinus, expectavi pedes meos in cymbalis
Nullus norvegicorum sole urinat
Bookmarks