Update:
New version with rounded Paddle and slightly different gameplay uploaded.
Version number now 0.96 so there may be room for some further adjustments before the 1.0 release.
What happened to versions 0.93 - 0.95? Except for 0.95 which briefly appeared they never made it. Failed approaches but learning experiences, I say.
Ponx 0.96 for Linux is downloadable from:
https://www.jonax.se/Linux.php
ponx096.png
Is compiled on Debian but runs on openSuSE also. Haven't tried other distros yet..
Last edited by Jonax; 24-05-2022 at 02:35 PM. Reason: Minor adjustments
Let me guess. You decided to go with rounded edges on the paddle in order to simplify physics when ball hits edge of the paddle since this way you can actually use physics of two balls bouncing of each other.Originally Posted by Jonax
Indeed thus the rounded edges. Round objects are so much easier. Though I took some liberties with the physics of bouncing. For further simplification of course. And for somewhat improving the gameplay, I hope. And when you mention bouncing balls I have an idea of making a remake of an ancient bouncing balls program I once made in Delphi 3. But no promises there. Haven't even started yet. Though I figure some code from this program can be recycled there.Let me guess. You decided to go with rounded edges on the paddle in order to simplify physics when ball hits edge of the paddle since this way you can actually use physics of two balls bouncing of each other.
Well if this old game you mention is heavily physics based then you should perhaps consider using some existing physics engine in that game instead of trying to handle all the physics yourself.
Lately Box2d https://code.google.com/archive/p/box2d-delphi/ is considered as a basic 2D based physics engine that many Delphi developers use. Now while the headers are designed for Delphi I'm guessing you should not have to much trouble compiling them with FPC just make sure you enable Delphi mode https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse74.html (might not be necessary) and Advanced Records (which already seem to enabled by default in FPC 2.6.0 and newer) since the headers heavily rely on using them.
Or perhaps you might decide to use Kraft Physics Engine https://github.com/BeRo1985/kraft instead. Kraft Physics Engine is much more advanced and also fully supports 3D physics. It is being used in Castle Game Engine https://castle-engine.io/ which is one of the most popular pascal based game engines lately.
Thanks SilverWarior. I got to have a look at those engines. I just spawned a new Virtual Machine for the purpose. Noticed a new Lazarus version recently arrived. Though seems to be mostly smaller adjustments this time. But that's the easy part. The tricky thing will be to try out those physics engines.
Meanwhile I will make an other attempt to handle the physics myself in the upcoming heavily physcis based game, or program. If it ever gets done of course. It's easy to talk about games to do but then really finishing them is a totally other matter. And I haven't even started yet..
Tell me about it. I myself have half a dozen unfinished game ideas in the works. Main reason why they are not finished is the lack of needed knowledge to turn my quite big ideas into code. Some people might even say that I'm aiming to big.
The eternal conflict between ambition and resources. Of course I have no idea about your projects and situation but scaling back a little might be a good approach. There's the matter of availabe time and energy. On the other hand it's never wrong to aim for the stars...
Can you say anything about your favourite top ideas?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks